Recupero, A., Talamo, A., Triberti, S., & Modesti, C. (2019). Bridging museum mission to visitors’ experience: activity, meanings, interactions, technology. Frontiers in psychology, 10, 2092.
Aarsand, P. A. (2007). Computer and video games in family life: The digital divide as a resource in intergenerational interactions. Childhood, 14(2), 235-256.
Atkinson, R. (1998). The Life Story Interview. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
de Araújo, L. M., Königschulte, A., & Erb, U. (2010). ENHANCING VISITORS’EXPERIENCE–A SERIOUS GAME FOR MUSEUM ENVIRONMENT. In In Proceedings of EDULEARN10 Conference. 5th-7th July (pp. 6342-6348).
Ballantyne, R., and Uzzell, D. (2011). Looking back and looking forward: the rise of the visitor-centered museum. Curator 54, 85–92. doi: 10.1111/j.2151-6952.2010.00071.x
Bannon, L. (1991). “From human factors to human actors. the role of psychology and human-computer interaction studies in systems design,” in Design at Work: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems, eds J. Greenbaum and M. Kyng (Hillsdale, MI: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates), 25–44.
Bannon, L. (2011). Reimagining HCI: toward a more human-centered perspective. Interactions 18, 50–57. doi: 10.1145/1978822.1978833
Bearman, D., and Geber, K. (2008). Transforming cultural heritage institutions through new media. Mus. Manag. Curatorship 23, 385–399.
Benefield, A., Bitgood, S., and Shettel, H. (1993). Visitor studies: theory, research and practice. Curator 36, 238–240.
Bitgood, S. C. (2002). “Environmental psychology in museums, zoos and other exhibition centers,” in Handbook of Environmental Psychology, eds R. B. Bechtel and A. Churchman (New York, NY: Wiley), 461–480.
Black, G. (2005). The Engaging Museum: Developing Museums for Visitor Involvement. New York, NY: Routledge.
Black, G. (2012). Transforming Museums in the Twenty-First Century. New York, NY: Routledge.
Bødker, S. (1987). Through the interface-A human activity approach to user interface design. DAIMI Rep. Ser. 16:161. doi: 10.7146/dpb.v16i224.7586
Bødker, S. (1990). Activity theory as a challenge to systems design. DAIMI Rep. Ser. 334, doi: 10.7146/dpb.v19i334.6564
Bødker, S. (2015). Third-wave HCI, 10 years later - participation and sharing. Interactions 22, 24–31. doi: 10.1145/2804405
Bødker, S., and Klokmose, C. N. (2012). “Dynamics in artifact ecologies,” in Proceedings of the 7th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Making Sense Through Design, (New York, NY: ACM), 448–457.
Bruni, A., and Gherardi, S. (2007). Studiare le pratiche lavorative. Bologna: Il mulino.
Cancellieri, U. G., Manca, S., Laurano, F., Molinario, E., Talamo, A., Recupero, A., et al. (2018). Visitors’ satisfaction and perceived affective qualities towards museums: the impact of recreational areas. Rass. Psicol. 35, 5–18. doi: 10.4458/0135-01\
Carlesson, R. (2020) How can museums use gaming to their advantage?[online] Available at: https://www.museumnext.com/article/how-can-museums-use-gaming-to-their-advantage/ . Accessed on: 6/08/2020.
Carroll, J., Howard, S., Vetere, F., Peck, J., and Murphy, J. (2002). “Just what do the youth of today want? Technology appropriation by young people,” in Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, (Piscataway, NJ: IEEE), 1777–1785.
Cultraro, M., Gabellone, F., and Scardozzi, G. (2009). “The virtual musealization of archaeological sites: between documentation and communication,” in Proceedings of the 3rd ISPRS International Workshop 3D-ARCH, Trento.
Damala, A., Marchal, I., and Houlier, P. (2007). “Merging augmented reality based features in mobile multimedia museum guides,” In Proceedings of the XXI International Symposium CIPA 2007. (Athens: CIPA), 259–264.
Damala, A., and Stojanovic, N. (2012). “Tailoring the adaptive augmented reality (a2r) museum visit: identifying cultural heritage professionals’ motivations and needs,” in Proceedings of the 2012 International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR-AMH), (Piscataway, NJ: IEEE), 71–80.
De Rojas, C., and Camarero, C. (2008). Visitors’ experience, mood and satisfaction in a heritage context: evidence from an interpretation center. Tour. Manag. 29, 525–537. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2007.06.004
Dierking, L. D., and Falk, J. H. (1992). Redefining the museum experience: the interactive experience model. Visit. Stud. 4, 173–176.
Dourish, P. (2006). “Implications for DESIGN,” In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New York, NY: ACM), 541–550.
Draper, J. (2015). Ethnography: principles, practice and potential. Nurs. Stand. 29, 36–41. doi: 10.7748/ns.29.36.36.e8937
Edmonds, E., Muller, L., and Connell, M. (2006). On creative engagement. Vis. Commun. 5, 307–322. doi: 10.1177/1470357206068461
Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by Expanding: An Activity-Theoretical Approach to Developmental Research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.
Engeström, Y. (2000). Activity theory as a framework for analyzing and redesigning work. Ergonomics 43, 960–974. doi: 10.1080/001401300409143
Falk, J. H., and Dierking, L. D. (2016). The Museum Experience Revisited. New York, NY: Routledge.
Falk, J. H., Moussouri, T., and Coulson, D. (1998). The effect of visitor agendas on museum learning. Curator 41, 107–120. doi: 10.1111/j.2151-6952.1998.tb00822.x
Folcher, V. (2003). Appropriating artifacts as instruments: when design-for-use meets design-in-use. Interact. Comput. 15, 647–663. doi: 10.1016/S0953-5438(03)00057-2
Gill, R., Barbour, J., and Dean, M. (2014). Shadowing in/as work: ten recommendations for shadowing fieldwork practice. Qual. Res. Organ. Manag. Int. J. 9, 69–89. doi: 10.1108/QROM-09-2012-1100
Giorgi, S., Ceriani, M., Bottoni, P., Talamo, A., and Ruggiero, S. (2013). “Keeping “InTOUCH”: an ongoing co-design project to share memories, skills and demands through an interactive table,” in Human Factors in Computing and Informatics, eds A. Holzinger, M. Ziefle, M. Hitz, and M. Debevc (Berlin: Springer), 633–640. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-39062-3_43
Goulding, C. (2000). The museum environment and the visitor experience. Eur. J. Mark. 34, 261–278. doi: 10.1108/03090560010311849
Hammersley, M., and Atkinson, P. (2007). Ethnography: Principles in Practice, 3rd Edn, Abingdon: Routledge.
Hein, G. E. (1999). “The constructivist museum,” in The Educational Role of the Museum, ed. E. Hooper-Greenhill (Milton Park: Psychology Press), 73–79.
Hein, G. E. (2002). Learning in the MUSEUM. New York, NY: Routledge.
Hooper-Greenhill, E. (2000). Changing values in the art museum: rethinking communication and learning. Int. J. Herit. Stud. 6, 9–31. doi: 10.1080/135272500363715
Hooper-Greenhill, E. (2006). “Studying visitors,” in A Companion to Museum Studies, ed. S. Macdonald (Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing), 362–376.
Hooper-Greenhill, E. (2004). Measuring learning outcomes in museums, archives and libraries: the learning impact research project (LIRP). Int. J. Herit. Stud. 10, 151–174.
Jonassen, D. H., & Rohrer-Murphy, L. (1999) Activity theory as a framework for designing constructivist learning environments. Educational technology research and development, 47(1), 61-79.
IJsselsteijn, W. A., de Ridder, H., Freeman, J., and Avons, S. E. (2000). “Presence: concept, determinants, and measurement,” in Proceedings of the Human Vision and Electronic Imaging V, San Jose, CA.
Jung, H., Stolterman, E., Ryan, W., Thompson, T., and Siegel, M. (2008). “Toward a framework for ecologies of artifacts: how are digital artifacts interconnected within a personal life?,” in Proceedings of the 5th Nordic Conference on Human-computer Interaction: Building Bridges, (New York, NY: ACM), 201–210.
Jung, T., tom Dieck, M. C., Lee, H., and Chung, N. (2016). “Effects of virtual reality and augmented reality on visitor experiences in museum,” in Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2016, eds A. Inversini and R. Schegg (Cham: Springer), 621–635. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-28231-2_45
Kaptelinin, V. (2011). “Designing technological support for meaning making in museum learning: an activity-theoretical framework,” in Proceedings of the 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, (Piscataway, NJ: IEEE), 1–10.
Kaptelinin, V., and Nardi, B. A. (2006). Acting with Technology: Activity Theory and Interaction Design. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
Kirchberg, V., and Tröndle, M. (2012). Experiencing exhibitions: a review of studies on visitor experiences in museums. Curator 55, 435–452. doi: 10.1111/j.2151-6952.2012.00167.x
Kuutti, K. (1996). “Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research,” in Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human-Computer Interaction, ed. B. Nardi (Boston, MA: MIT Press), 17–44.
Leont’ev, A. (1978). Activity, Consciousness, and Personality. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice-Hall.
Leont’ev, A. N. (1974). The problem of activity in psychology. Sov. psychol. 13, 4–33. doi: 10.2753/RPO1061-040513024
Lombard, M., and Ditton, T. (1997). At the heart of it all: the concept of presence. J. Comput. Mediat. Commun. 3, 107–113. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00072.x
Loscos, C., Tecchia, F., Frisoli, A., Carrozzino, M., Widenfeld, H. R., Swapp, D., et al. (2004). “The museum of pure form: touching real statues in an immersive virtual museum,” in Proceedings of the 5th International conference on Virtual Reality, Archaeology and Intelligent Cultural Heritage, Oudenaarde.
Macdonald, S. (ed.) (2006). A Companion to Museum Studies. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Maréchal, G. (2010). “Autoethnography,” in Encyclopedia of Case Study Research, Vol. 2, eds A. J. Mills, G. Durepos, and E. Wiebe (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications), 43–45.
McCall, V., and Gray, C. (2014). Museums and the ‘new museology’: theory, practice and organisational change. Mus. Manag. Curatorship 29, 19–35.
McDonald, S. (2005). Studying actions in context: a qualitative shadowing method for organizational research. Qual. Res. 5, 455–473. doi: 10.1177/1468794105056923
Mellini, B. (2013). The Materialization of Articulation Work and its Implications on Nursing Practices. Ph.D. thesis, Sapienza University, Trento.
Museum Next (2019) A History of Museum Games at the Science Museum [online] Available at: https://vimeo.com/307970387 . Accessed on 4/08/2020.
Norman, D. A. (1980). Twelve issues for cognitive science. Cogn. Sci. 4, 1–32. doi: 10.1016/S0364-0213(81)80002-X
Norman, D. A. (1991). “Cognitive artifacts,”In Designing Interaction: Psychology at the Human-Computer Interface ed. J. M. Carroll (Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University), 17–38.
Petrucco, C., and Agostini, D. (2016). Teaching cultural heritage using mobile augmented reality. J. e-Learn. Knowl. Soc. 12, 115–128.
Phon, D. N. E., Ali, M. B., and Halim, N. D. A. (2014). “Collaborative augmented reality in education: a review,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Teaching and Learning in Computing and Engineering (LaTiCE), (Piscataway, NJ: IEEE), 78–83.
Preece, J., Rogers, Y., and Sharp, H. (2002). Interaction Design, Beyond Human-Computer Interaction. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Räisänen, T., Ypsilanti, A., Ropes, D., Vivas, A. B., Viitala, M., & Ijäs, T. (2014). Examining the requirements for an intergenerational learning game. Education and Information Technologies, 19(3), 531-547.
Recupero, A., Triberti, S., Modesti, C., and Talamo, A. (2018). Mixed reality for cross-cultural integration: using positive technology to share experiences and promote communication. Front. Psychol. 9:1223.
Rennie, L. J., and Johnston, D. J. (2007). Visitors’ perceptions of changes in their thinking about science and technology following a visit to science center. Visit. Stud. 10, 168–177.
Ross, M. (2004). Interpreting the new museology. Mus. Soc. 2, 84–103. doi: 10.29311/mas.v2i2.43
Science Museum (2015) Rugged Rovers at the Science Museum wins 2015 International Pay award. [online] Available at: https://www.sciencemuseum.org.uk/about-us/press-office/rugged-rovers-science-museum-wins-2015-international-play-award. Accessed on: 14/08/2020
Simon, N. (2010). The Participatory Museum. Santa Cruz, CA: Museum 2.0.
Styx, L. (2019) How can games in museums enhance visitor experience?[online] Available at: https://www.museumnext.com/article/how-can-games-in-museums-enhance-visitor-experience/ . Accessed on: 04/08/2020.
Suits, B. (1967b). What is a game? Philosophy of Science,34(2), 148–156.
Talamo, A., Giorgi, S., and Mellini, B. (2011a). “Designing technologies for ageing: is simplicity always a leading criterion?,” in Proceedings of the 9th ACM SIGCHI Italian Chapter International Conference on Computer-Human Interaction: Facing Complexity, (New York, NY: ACM), 33–36.
Talamo, A., Mellini, B., and Giorgi, S. (2011b). “Ergonomia sociale,” in Ergonomia Cognitiva, ed. F. Di Nocera (Rome: Carrocci), 251–281.
Talamo, A., Mellini, B., Ventura, S., and Recupero, A. (2015). “Studying practices to inform design: organizational issues and local artifacts,” in Designing Technology, Work, Organizations and Vice Versa, eds A. Bruni, L. L. Parolin, and C. Schubert (Wilmington: Vernon Press), 71–113.
tom Dieck, M. C., Jung, T., and Han, D. I. (2016). Mapping requirements for the wearable smart glasses augmented reality museum application. J. Hosp. Tour. Technol. 7, 230–253. doi: 10.1108/JHTT-09-2015-0036
Tzortzaki, D. (2002). “Virtual reality as simulation: the cave as “Space of Illusion” in museum displays,” in Virtual Space, eds L. Qvortrup, J. F. Jensen, E. Kjems, N. Lehmann, and C. Madsen (London: Springer), 258–284. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4471-0225-0_12
Vergo, P. (ed.) (1997). New Museology. London: Reaktion books.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1980). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard university press.
Vlahakis, V., Karigiannis, J., Tsotros, M., Gounaris, M., Almeida, L., Stricker, D., et al. (2001). “Archeoguide: first results of an augmented reality, mobile computing system in cultural heritage sites,” in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Virtual Reality, Archaeology and Cultural Heritage (New York, NY: ACM), 131–140.
Yoon, S. A., and Wang, J. (2014). Making the invisible visible in science museums through augmented reality devices. TechTrends 58, 49–55. doi: 10.1007/s11528-013-0720-7
Young, I. (2008). Mental Models: Aligning Design Strategy with Human Behavior. Rosenfeld Media. New York, NY: Rosenfeld Media.
Zhang, H., Wu, Y., and Buhalis, D. (2018). A model of perceived image, memorable tourism experiences and revisit intention. J. Destinat. Mark. Manag. 8, 326–336. doi: 10.1016/j.jdmm.2017.06.004
Picture of MicroRangers, (2020), MicroRangers [ONLINE]. Available at: https://www.google.com/search?q=MicroRangers&rlz=1C1CHBD_en-GBGB881GB881&sxsrf=ALeKk00TIJuMe7u9Sz223dvVEQ1Y_FzM6A:1598268075738&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj_zaPH3LPrAhUPTx UIHbf_C6kQ_AUoA3oECA4QBQ&biw=1536&bih=754&dpr=1.25#imgrc=rMegFaUUdEvcjM [Accessed 27 August 2020].